Skip to content

Self-assessment

Does your tenant still depend on one person’s memory?

Six practical signals reveal responsibilities without an owner, cadence, or record-without inventing a maturity score.

Answer according to what the team can explain today. The resulting list stays in your browser and can prepare an internal discussion or initial scoping conversation.Answer yes, no, or unsure - no score is calculated.

Accountability

Can someone explain who decides on M365 changes and who verifies the result?

  • An owner and backup are known
  • Sensitive decisions have an approval path
  • One departure would not erase all tenant memory

Access and guests

Do you know why guests, groups, and privileged accounts still exist?

  • Guests have a reason and owner
  • Administrative roles are justified
  • Inactive accounts trigger a decision

Licences and lifecycle

Do joiners, role changes, and leavers follow a checklist that handles additions, removals, and responsibility transfers?

Data and Copilot

Before buying or enabling Copilot, does the team understand broadly shared spaces, guests, and data ownership?

No-collection planner

Prepare your next tenant review.

Select only the situations that resemble yours. Nothing is sent or retained. You can copy the list before reviewing the available contact options.

Situations to address

Several uncertain answers do not automatically mean “audit.”

A limited starting state and management cadence may be enough. A deep security anomaly, migration, or redesign needs separate scope.

Let’s discuss ownership of your M365 tenant

Describe your team, what currently lacks an owner, and the outcome you need. No tenant access is required for this first conversation.

Direct email remains the simplest way to start. Use the public m365care.ca address with an already attributed subject.